Copy_Paste_Remix_#4: Black Folks Influence Everything: From the Black Panther Party to Black Twitter
This essay argues that Black Americans function as foundational architects of American culture, shaping the nation’s political imagination, aesthetic traditions, linguistic innovation, and digital expression across decades. Tracing a progression from the radical visual and political interventions of the 1960s to the algorithmic dynamics of Black Twitter and contemporary digital culture, the analysis demonstrates how Black creativity consistently sets the cultural tempo of the United States. Drawing on scholarship in Black studies, cultural theory, and media studies, the essay examines how Black expressive forms, ranging from the organizing strategies of the Black Panther Party to the global dominance of hip hop and Afrofuturist cinema, circulate beyond their communities of origin and often become commodified or detached from their political foundations. By situating Black cultural production within the framework of racial capitalism and diasporic influence, the essay contends that American culture is structurally dependent on Black innovation while frequently obscuring its origins. Ultimately, it asserts that Black cultural labor is not peripheral to the American story but constitutive of it.
Copy_Paste_Remix_#3: “Who Gets a Name?: Keith Porter Jr., Renee Good, and the Politics of Public Memory
This essay examines the racialized dynamics of media attention, public memory, and movement co-optation through a comparative analysis of two recent killings by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The deaths of Keith Porter Jr., a Black man killed in Los Angeles in December 2025, and Renee Nicole Good, a white woman killed in Minneapolis one week later, reveal stark disparities in visibility, narrative framing, and national response. While both cases raise serious questions about state violence and accountability, only one rapidly entered the national consciousness through widespread media coverage, political response, and formal documentation. Drawing on the historical aims of movements such as Say Her Name and Black Lives Matter, the essay argues that the uneven recognition of these deaths reflects broader structures of racial inequality that determine whose lives are publicly mourned and whose remain obscured. The analysis highlights how symbolic justice movements risk dilution when attention is redirected toward already visible narratives, reinforcing rather than disrupting racial hierarchies of grief, legitimacy, and remembrance.
—Telisa Nyoka King, M.A.
Copy_Paste_Remix_#2: The People’s Choice —Zohran Mamdani and the New York We Deserve
This essay, The People’s Choice: Zohran Mamdani and the New York We Deserve, examines the cultural and political significance of Zohran Mamdani’s historic election as New York City’s 111th mayor. Moving beyond conventional political reporting, it interprets Mamdani’s victory as a rupture in the city’s power narrative—one that redefines representation, equity, and belonging for immigrant, working-class, and Muslim communities. Through a lens of identity politics and moral economy, the essay explores how Mamdani’s platform—housing justice, public-transit equity, and NYPD accountability—translates grassroots values into policy ambition. It situates his rise within a broader critique of neoliberal governance, arguing that Mamdani embodies a new political remix that fuses community organizing with institutional leadership. Ultimately, the essay positions his election as both a reflection and a reimagining of New York’s collective self-image, suggesting that the city has not only chosen a mayor but mirrored its most human aspirations back to itself.
— Telisa Nyoka King, M.A.
Copy_Paste_Remix_#1: SNAP Judgment — When the United States Criminalizes Hunger
This essay, “SNAP Judgment: When the United States Criminalizes Hunger,” examines how the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reveals the structural violence embedded in U.S. social policy. Framed through an Ethnic Studies lens, it traces the racialized history of welfare discourse—from Reagan’s “welfare queen” myth to modern debates over work requirements—and exposes how hunger is politicized as a moral failure rather than a policy design. Drawing on recent data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and equity-focused research from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the essay argues that SNAP’s erosion reflects a broader ideology that privileges corporate subsidy over human survival. It also spotlights Bay Area food banks as sites of grassroots resistance, demonstrating how community-led food justice efforts sustain dignity where federal safety nets fail. Ultimately, the piece contends that hunger in America is not accidental but deliberate—a product of systemic inequity disguised as fiscal discipline, and a mirror reflecting who this nation chooses to feed and who it allows to starve.
—Telisa Nyoka King, M.A.